Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In England and Wales, the minimum interval between the granting of decree nisi and that of decree absolute was amended by the Family Law Act 1996 [4] and is now six weeks. In practice, courts use an interval of six weeks and one day. Another exception regarding orders nisi is where a creditor seeks to place a charge on land for money owed.
A decree (Latin: decretum, from decerno, 'I judge') is, in a general sense, an order or law made by a superior authority for the direction of others. In the usage of the canon law of the Catholic Church, it has various meanings. Any papal bull, brief, or motu proprio is a decree inasmuch as these documents are legislative acts of the pope. In ...
The Earl of Aylesford attempted to divorce his wife, but was himself found guilty of adultery, and thus the decree nisi was cancelled. [15] Evelyn Katrine Gwenfra Williams (1855–1939), who married Henry Wellesley, 3rd Duke of Wellington in 1882. [16]
The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 (1 Edw. 8. & 1 Geo. 6.c. 57) is a law on divorce in the United Kingdom.It extended the grounds for divorce, which until then only included adultery, to include unlawful desertion for three years or more, cruelty, and incurable insanity, incest or sodomy.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
After several months Reilly filed a second marriage restitution order, which Petah failed to comply with, as a result of which a decree nisi for dissolution of the marriage was granted in September 1941. [72] The divorce between Virgil and Petah Reilly was finalised in July 1944. [73] Reilly's eldest son Gavan had enlisted in the A.I.F. in July ...
This page was last edited on 3 August 2005, at 20:46 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may ...
They received their decree nisi in November 1918 on account of his abandonment, and his infidelity at the Black Rabbit Inn, Arundel, Sussex. [37] Macklin occasionally suffered financial difficulties. In 1928 he was sued for £400 (equivalent to £30,442 in 2023), said by the plaintiff William Edward Pearson to be moneys lent and not repaid.