Ads
related to: california petition for rehearing a contract
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The plaintiff filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, the rehearing was denied. In January 2015, the District court granted in part summary judgment. Subsequent action: The summary judgment was denied in relationship with some of the alleged contractual infringements: Court membership; Judge sitting: Dolly M. Gee: Case opinions
Appellate review of the decisions of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, [37] the Public Utilities Commission, [38] and the Workers Compensation Appeals Board of the Department of Industrial Relations [39] is available only by petition for writ of review (California's modern term for certiorari) to the relevant California Court of Appeal ...
The circuit court denied a petition for an en banc rehearing; a simultaneous certiorari petition to the Supreme Court was granted. A major issue at all levels was whether the department's written Internet policy, or Duke's practice of just collecting the overage fee, was the operating reality of the OPD workplace.
Petition for rehearing denied on June 18, 1945, 325 U.S. 897 (1945). Holding; The underground travel time of coal miners was considered compensable work time under § 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). Court membership; Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone Associate Justices Owen Roberts · Hugo Black
Rule 13 of the United States Supreme Court Rules of Procedure requires the losing party in a case before a court of appeals to file a petition for a writ of certiorari within 90 days from the date the court of appeals enters its judgment, or from the date of the denial of a petition for rehearing in the court of appeals. The Sixth Circuit's ...
In April 1986, the Ninth Circuit denied the SFAA's petition for rehearing en banc. Three judges strongly dissented with that decision, finding that the panel's interpretation of the Act raised serious First Amendment issues. [10] [12] [13] The SFAA appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court in August 1986. [10]
“Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied,” the decision says. “The petition for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service.
The government filed a petition for rehearing by the Appeals court but it was denied on May 3, 2006, by a vote of 7–4. [17] Two of the judges voting against the rehearing gave their reasoning writing that "the obvious tension which has evolved in this area of jurisprudence ... can only be resolved by the Supreme Court ...