When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: employee final warning before termination

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_Adjustment_and...

    The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (the "WARN Act") is a U.S. labor law that protects employees, their families, and communities by requiring most employers with 100 or more employees to provide notification 60 calendar days in advance of planned closings and mass layoffs of employees. [1]

  3. Loudermill hearing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudermill_hearing

    [3] If a pretermination hearing is "oral or written notice of the charges against [the employee], an explanation of the employer's evidence [against the employee], and an opportunity [for the employee] to present their side of the story." [4] In West v. Grand County, [5] the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit quoted Loudermill, stating:

  4. Termination of employment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_of_employment

    Termination of employment or separation of employment is an employee's departure from a job and the end of an employee's duration with an employer. Termination may be voluntary on the employee's part (resignation), or it may be at the hands of the employer, often in the form of dismissal (firing) or a layoff. Dismissal or firing is usually ...

  5. How a GM layoff email sent to employees triggered a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/gm-layoff-email-sent-employees...

    The affected employees will receive a payment equivalent to their wages and benefits as if they were employed through Jan. 14, 2025.” WARN requires a 60-day notice before a mass layoff or plant ...

  6. Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co.

    Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of ...

  7. ‘Worse than toxic’: Employees allege culture of retaliation ...

    www.aol.com/worse-toxic-employees-allege-culture...

    The Statesman spoke with 17 former and current employees who described a pattern of retaliation ... In Ward’s letter of termination, CDH said he was fired for working while he was on medical ...