When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pennsylvania v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._New_York

    Pennsylvania v. New York, was a case which were heard in 1972 before the U.S. Supreme Court. The initial filing was allowed at 407 U.S. 206 [1] and the final decision was ordered at 407 U.S. 223 (1972). [2] When two states have a controversy between each other, the case is filed for original jurisdiction with the United States Supreme Court ...

  3. Supreme Court Can Protect Property Owners From Eminent ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-protect-property...

    A Utica, New York, land grab offers the justices an opportunity to revisit a widely criticized precedent. Supreme Court Can Protect Property Owners From Eminent Domain Abuse Skip to main content

  4. New York business fraud lawsuit against the Trump Organization

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_business_fraud...

    New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within The Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).

  5. Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the...

    In contrast, criminal forfeiture is a legal action brought as "part of the criminal prosecution of a defendant", described by the Latin term in personam, meaning "against the person", and happens when government indicts or charges the property that is either used in connection with a crime, or derived from a crime, that is suspected of being ...

  6. Delaware v. Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware_v._Pennsylvania

    The court discussed the case of Pennsylvania v. New York, 407 U. S. 206 (1972). In this case, Pennsylvania asked for the Supreme Court to change its rules for escheatment because it was creating an unfair "windfall" to states where money orders are purchased, moving money to the state of New York.

  7. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Holland Land Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holland_Land_Company

    In 1839, the last land in Western New York was sold off to local investors and settlers, and the Batavia office was closed. [2] Land sales in Pennsylvania were concluded in 1849, [7] and in 1856, the Philadelphia headquarters closed. [2] The company was formally dissolved in 1858. The town of Holland, New York was named after the company. [29]