Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Army Modeling & Simulation Office (AMSO) is a US Army organization within the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-8 of the United States Army, Center for Army Analysis (CAA). Previously, the AMSO transitioned from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-3/5/7.
26A Network Systems Engineer (formerly Functional Area 24A, Telecommunications Systems Engineer) 26B Information Systems Engineer (formerly Functional Area 53A, Information Systems Manager) 26Z Senior Information Network Engineer (26A and 26B merge at O6 to 26Z)
In order to assess US capability to execute Joint Integrating Concepts there are three phases to capabilities-based assessment: a functional area analysis, a functional needs analysis, and a functional solutions analysis. The functional area analysis identifies operational tasks, conditions and standards needed to accomplish objectives.
The Army Model and Simulation Executive Council (AMSEC) last convened in 2005; soon after it was discontinued by the Army M&S Office (AMSO). All public access to any AMSEC-related documents were removed at that time. Any documents provided by non-AMSO personnel should not be considered current.
In addition to Nellis AFB, areas outside of the current NTTR land area are used for related activities, e.g., about 1,107 sq mi (2,870 km 2) of the former military range land (relinquished 1942, e.g. ranges 46–56, [10] and c. 1953) is under the Nellis "Area A" airspace that is a Military Operations Area (MOA). [11]
United States Army Strategist or Functional Area 59 or FA59 is a functional area of the United States Army.While the U.S. military and Army has had strategic thinkers throughout its history, the United States Army's FA59 career field emerged in the late 1990's with its first cohort beginning duty in 2001, partially due to arguments made by General John R. Galvin in a 1989 article advocating ...
Once the user has developed a model, it can be run to predict the probability of mission success (e.g., accomplishment of certain objectives or completion of tasks within a given time frame), time to complete the mission, workload experienced by the operators, and the sequence of tasks (and timeline) throughout the mission.
Documents the need for a materiel solution to a specific capability gap derived from an initial analysis of alternatives executed by the operational user and, as required, an independent analysis of alternatives. It defines the capability gap in terms of the functional area, the relevant range of military operations, desired effects, and time.