When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: franklin county court case lookup

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Two Franklin County men charged with child porn possession - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-franklin-county-men-charged...

    The cases are not related. Justin Michael Dingle and Justin Frank Chappell, both 36, have been in Franklin County Jail since Thursday and Friday, respectively, according to online court records.

  3. 4 charged, including nurse, in 2022 death of patient at Ohio ...

    www.aol.com/4-charged-including-nurse-2022...

    Fusik had been at the facility for about a month, according to Cuyahoga County court records, after being found not competent in a 2022 case where Fusik had been charged with murder in connection ...

  4. Court roundup: Men sentenced for fatal shootings at Italian ...

    www.aol.com/court-roundup-men-sentenced-fatal...

    Micheal Mickens, 25, entered a guilty plea to a charge of aggravated assault in Franklin County Common Pleas Court Wednesday in the June 19 death of 29-year-old Isiaha Thompson-Angus.

  5. United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District...

    Unlike the Supreme Court, where one justice is specifically nominated to be chief, the office of chief judge rotates among the district court judges. To be chief, a judge must have been in active service on the court for at least one year, be under the age of 65, and have not previously served as chief judge.

  6. Big trials in Franklin County in 2024 include three ex ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/big-trials-franklin-county-2024...

    On Dec. 22, Coy's case was continued as a Franklin County Common Pleas Court awaits a status update on his cancer treatment. Another hearing is expected to be scheduled for sometime in January.

  7. Berkemer v. McCarty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkemer_v._McCarty

    Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court that ruled that a person in police custody following a misdemeanor traffic offense was entitled to the protections of the Fifth Amendment pursuant to the decision in Miranda v.