Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Edwards v. Vannoy , 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Court's prior decision in Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which had ruled that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 593 of the United States Reports: . Note: As of August 2024, final bound volumes for the U.S. Supreme Court's United States Reports have been published through volume 579.
Hunt Construction Group is an American construction management firm based in Indianapolis, Indiana.The company was formerly known as Huber, Hunt & Nichols was founded in 1944 by Paul B. Hunt, Arber J. Huber and Harry S. Nichols. [1]
Eugene M. Courtier was an Edwards Air Force Base technician, and the kidnapping took place on a Lancaster, California highway. The sale of Courtier's car also took place in Lancaster. The criminals, Leonard Daniel Mahan, James Bartley Carrigan and Don Eugene Hall, were tried and convicted. [1]
A former security guard is suing the Dallas Police Department over an arrest during which he was beaten and tasered, after being mistaken for a violent criminal with a similar name.. Silvester ...
Thomas Francis Edwards (1944 – February 14, 2009), known as The Bethesda Butcher, was an American serial killer.A long-time suspect in two murders committed along the Capital Beltway for which he was never tried, Edwards was instead convicted and sentenced to death for murdering a girl in California in 1981, he remained on death row until his death in 2009.
Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, 576 U.S. 200 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that license plates are government speech and are consequently more easily regulated/subjected to content restrictions than private speech under the First Amendment.
Teague v. Lane , 489 U.S. 288 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the application of newly announced rules of law in habeas corpus proceedings. This case addresses the Federal Court's threshold standard of deciding whether Constitutional claims will be heard.