When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: how to identify fallacies easily and quickly in english grammar and examples

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Informal fallacies, in particular, are frequently found in mass media such as television and newspapers. [9] Understanding fallacies may allow one to recognize them in either one's own or others' writing. Avoiding fallacies may help improve one's ability to produce sound arguments. [10]

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Syllogistic fallacies – logical fallacies that occur in syllogisms. Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative) – a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion, but at least one negative premise. [11] Fallacy of exclusive premises – a categorical syllogism that is invalid because both of its premises are negative ...

  4. Attacking Faulty Reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacking_Faulty_Reasoning

    Fallacies that violate the structural criterion. The structural criterion requires that one who argues for or against a position should use an argument that meets the fundamental structural requirements of a well-formed argument, using premises that are compatible with one another, that do not contradict the conclusion, that do not assume the truth of the conclusion, and that are not involved ...

  5. An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Illustrated_Book_of_Bad...

    Each "bad argument" is discussed on a double page, with a written explanation on one side and an illustration on the other. The book is written using terse prose that relies heavily on the use of examples. [3] [4] The illustrations are done in a woodcut style and are said to be inspired by characters from Lewis Carroll's stories and poems. [5]

  6. Descriptive fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_fallacy

    Austin's label of 'descriptive fallacy' was aimed primarily at logical positivism, and his speech act theory was largely a response to logical positivism's view that only statements that are logically or empirically verifiable have cognitive meaning. [2]

  7. Formal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy

    While a logical argument is a non sequitur if, and only if, it is invalid, the term "non sequitur" typically refers to those types of invalid arguments which do not constitute formal fallacies covered by particular terms (e.g., affirming the consequent). In other words, in practice, "non sequitur" refers to an unnamed formal fallacy.

  8. Correlative-based fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlative-based_fallacies

    Fallacies based on correlatives include: [1] False dilemma or false correlative. Here something which is not a correlative is treated as a correlative, excluding some other possibility. Denying the correlative where an attempt is made to introduce another option into a true correlative. Suppressed correlative

  9. Begging the question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

    The term was translated into English from Latin in the 16th century. The Latin version, petitio principii ' asking for the starting point ' , can be interpreted in different ways. Petitio (from peto ), in the post-classical context in which the phrase arose, means ' assuming ' or ' postulating ' , but in the older classical sense means ...