When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Michigan v. Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_v._Jackson

    Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in a police interrogation.In a decision written by Justice Stevens, the Court held that once an accused individual has claimed a right to counsel at a plea hearing or other court proceeding, a waiver of that right during later police questioning would ...

  3. Montejo v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montejo_v._Louisiana

    Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009), is a 5–4 decision by the United States Supreme Court that overruled the Court's decision in Michigan v. Jackson. [1] The case concerned the validity of a defendant's waiver of his right to counsel during a police interrogation. In reversing Jackson, the Court said such a waiver was valid. [2]

  4. Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Department_of...

    Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints. The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure." However, upon remand to the Michigan Supreme Court, that court held ...

  5. 2009 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_term_per_curiam...

    He criticized the Supreme Court's prior decision, from which he had dissented, and stated that he strongly disagreed with the decision to review the case again. Stevens agreed, however, with the Court's present conclusion that the failure to present additional mitigating evidence probably did not affect the outcome.

  6. Michigan v. Bryant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_v._Bryant

    Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court further developed the "primary purpose" test to determine whether statements are "testimonial" for Confrontation Clause purposes. [1] In Bryant, the Court expanded upon the test first articulated in Davis v.

  7. Jackson's Water Crisis Is a Climate Justice Wake-Up Call - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/jacksons-water-crisis-climate...

    After heavy flooding, Jackson's mostly Black residents went days without consistent running water. The disparities are hard to ignore. Jackson's Water Crisis Is a Climate Justice Wake-Up Call

  8. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Depot_U._S._A.,_Inc...

    Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Jackson, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case which determined that a third-party defendant to a counterclaim submitted in a state-court civil action cannot remove their case to federal court. The Court explained, in a 5–4 decision, that although a third-party counterclaim defendant is a ...

  9. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Metropolitan...

    Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974), is an administrative law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that extensive state regulation of a public utility does not transform its acts into state action that is reviewable by a federal court under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.