Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by a judge and can not be answered by a jury. [1] Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well as inferences arising from those facts. Answers to questions of law are generally ...
Jurisprudence, also known as theory of law or philosophy of law, is the examination in a general perspective of what law is and what it ought to be. It investigates issues such as the definition of law; legal validity; legal norms and values; and the relationship between law and other fields of study, including economics , ethics , history ...
In the law of the United States, a certified question is a formal request by one court from another court, usually but not always in another jurisdiction, for an opinion on a question of law. These cases typically arise when the court before which litigation is actually pending is required to decide a matter that turns on the law of another ...
The Supreme Court on Monday announced it has adopted a new code of conduct, a move that comes after a series of allegations of ethics lapses. Supreme Court adopts code of conduct amid ethics ...
Supreme Court justices had a message for the American public on Monday as they announced a code of conduct: We hear you, but you really don’t get us. Why the Supreme Court says ethics ...
United States Court of Federal Claims: Requires law students appearing before the court to "have knowledge of" the MRPC. [58] United States Tax Court: Requires attorneys to operate "in accordance with the letter and spirit" of the MRPC. [59] Uses MRPC Rules 1.7, 1.8, and 3.7 to define and address attorney conflict of interest situations. [60]
The debate over the Supreme Court's recent ethics code centers on what it includes, excludes, and the motivations behind these decisions. Breaking down the new Supreme Court ethics code Skip to ...
Judges in an adversarial system are impartial in ensuring the fair play of due process, or fundamental justice.Such judges decide, often when called upon by counsel rather than of their own motion, what evidence is to be admitted when there is a dispute; though in some common law jurisdictions judges play more of a role in deciding what evidence to admit into the record or reject.