Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
"Two Dogmas of Empiricism" is a paper by analytic philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine published in 1951. According to University of Sydney professor of philosophy Peter Godfrey-Smith , this "paper [is] sometimes regarded as the most important in all of twentieth-century philosophy ". [ 1 ]
Much of Feyerabend's work from the late 1950s until the late 1960s was devoted to methodological issues in science. Specifically, Feyerabend offers several criticisms of empiricism and offers his own brand of theoretical pluralism. One such criticism concerns the distinction between observational and theoretical terms.
Berkeley's approach to empiricism would later come to be called subjective idealism. [28] [29] Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711–1776) responded to Berkeley's criticisms of Locke, as well as other differences between early modern philosophers, and moved empiricism to a new level of skepticism. Hume argued in keeping with the empiricist ...
Other critics of Kant continued to argue against the Critique of Pure Reason, with Gottlob August Tittel, who was influenced by Locke, publishing several polemics against Kant, who, although worried by some of Tittel's criticisms, addressed him only in a footnote in the preface to the Critique of Practical Reason. Tittel was one of the first to ...
Materialism and Empirio-criticism was republished in Russian in 1920 with an introduction attacking Bogdanov by Vladimir Nevsky, the Rector of the Sverdlov Communist University. It subsequently appeared in over 20 languages and acquired canonical status in Marxist–Leninist philosophy.
Feminist empiricism is a perspective within feminist research that combines the objectives and observations of feminism with the research methods and empiricism. [1] Feminist empiricism is typically connected to mainstream notions of positivism. Feminist empiricism critiques what it perceives to be inadequacies and biases within mainstream ...
Other philosophers also voiced their own criticisms of verificationism: The 1951 article "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", by Willard Van Orman Quine, found no suitable explanations for the concept of analyticity in that they reduced ultimately to circular reasoning. This served to uproot the analytic/synthetic division pivotal to verificationism. [19]
Radical empiricism is a postulate, a statement of fact, and a conclusion, says James in The Meaning of Truth.The postulate is that "the only things that shall be debatable among philosophers shall be things definable in terms drawn from experience."