When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. No, it does not. In order to count toward notability, each source must constitute significant coverage in an independent , reliable secondary source. The New York Times article is reliable, independent, and secondary – but not significant (a single-sentence mention in an article about another company).

  3. Wikipedia:Notability (academics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability...

    Having published work does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are. Notability depends on the impact the work has had on the field of study. This notability guideline specifies criteria for judging the notability of an academic through reliable sources for the impact of their work.

  4. Mendeley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendeley

    Not all the features available in the legacy "Mendeley Desktop" application have been yet implemented in the new "Mendeley Reference Manager" desktop application and it is unclear if they will be, because the "master" reference database of Mendeley is the on-line database available in the cloud, not the local database (a copy of the master ...

  5. Wikipedia : Training/For educators/Notability

    en.wikipedia.org/.../For_educators/Notability

    This guideline helps to clarify the notability question. In some cases, you may need to justify to other Wikipedians why the article topic is notable and should remain in Wikipedia. Coverage in published, reliable, secondary sources that are entirely independent of the subject, and which treat the subject in substantive detail is the key to ...

  6. Wikipedia : Training/For students/General notability guideline

    en.wikipedia.org/.../General_notability_guideline

    Notability The basic requirement for a topic to have its own article is: significant coverage in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content.

  7. Wikipedia:Notability explained - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_explained

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  8. Wikipedia : Training/core/General notability guideline

    en.wikipedia.org/.../General_notability_guideline

    Notability The basic requirement for a topic to have its own article is: significant coverage in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content.

  9. Wikipedia:Notability (schools) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(schools)

    While satisfying these notability guidelines generally indicates that a school warrants an article, a school article failing to do so is not a criterion for speedy deletion. This guideline can be considered a specialised version of Wikipedia:Notability applied to schools. It reflects the core values of Wikipedia policies, including the following:

  1. Related searches does mendeley work with notability in the classroom code of procedure is called

    mendeley cite freemendeley wiki
    mendeley websitemendeley app download
    mendeley reference manager free