Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Wonson (1812) established the historical test, which interpreted the amendment as relying on English common law to determine whether a jury trial was necessary in a civil suit. The amendment thus does not guarantee trial by jury in cases under maritime law, in lawsuits against the government itself, and for many parts of patent ...
Thirty-three amendments to the Constitution of the United States have been proposed by the United States Congress and sent to the states for ratification since the Constitution was put into operation on March 4, 1789. Twenty-seven of those, having been ratified by the requisite number of states, are part of the Constitution.
Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890) The Eleventh Amendment bars suits by citizens against their own state in federal court. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895) Income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents are, in effect, direct taxes that must be apportioned among the states according to their populations.
Nearly a dozen civil suits at the trial-level in federal court have Trump as a defendant. ... First Amendment experts and other lawyers have widely criticized Trump’s lawsuits against media ...
By contrast, a suit against a statewide agency is considered a suit against the state under the Eleventh Amendment. [21] In allowing suits against counties and municipalities, the court was unanimous, relying in part on its "general acquiescence" in such suits over the prior thirty years.
A judge acted unconstitutionally when he sealed the case file entirely for a civil suit over a Kansas Turnpike crash that killed three Topeka Girl Scouts, contends an attorney who maintains a ...
Qualified immunity applies only to government officials in civil litigation, and does not protect the government itself from suits arising from officials' actions. [4] The U.S. Supreme Court first introduced the qualified immunity doctrine in Pierson v. Ray, a case litigated during the height of the civil rights movement. It is stated to have ...
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the US Supreme Court ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an individual whose Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizures had been violated by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics.