Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Frontiers in Psychology is a peer-reviewed open-access academic journal covering all aspects of psychology. It was established in 2010 and is published by Frontiers Media , a controversial company that is included in Jeffrey Beall 's list of "potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers ".
Frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journals [2] currently active in science, technology, and medicine.It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram. [1]
Schmidt earned his BA in Psychology from Bellarmine College in 1966, then attended Purdue University to study industrial psychology, earning an M.S. in 1968 and a PhD in 1970. From 1970 to 1973 he was assistant professor of Industrial Psychology, Michigan State University , earning tenure and serving as an associate professor until 1974.
Proponents of preregistration have argued that it is "a method to increase the credibility of published results" (Nosek & Lakens, 2014), that it "makes your science better by increasing the credibility of your results" (Centre for Open Science), and that it "improves the interpretability and credibility of research findings" (Nosek et al., 2018 ...
[481] [482] Polygraphy has little credibility among scientists. [483] [484] Despite claims of 90–95% validity by polygraph advocates, and 95–100% by businesses providing polygraph services, [485] critics maintain that rather than a "test", the method amounts to an inherently unstandardizable interrogation technique whose accuracy cannot be ...
Specifically, the negative impression management or NIM scale, the malingering index scale or MAL, and the negative distortion validity scale or NDS of the PAI are interpreted in detecting malingering of PTSD. [39] [40] Using a combination of assessments is critical when evaluating PTSD malingering, rather than relying solely on a single test. [41]
A 2019 study in Scientific Data estimated with 95% confidence that of 1,989 articles on water resources and management published in 2017, study results might be reproduced for only 0.6% to 6.8%, largely because the articles did not provide sufficient information to allow for replication.
Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it.