Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the case where = (+ ()), there is a lower bound of () list labeling cost for deterministic algorithms. [6] Furthermore, the same lower bound holds for smooth algorithms, which are those whose only relabeling operation assigns labels evenly in a range of items [10] This lower bound is surprisingly strong in that it applies in the offline ...
Sorting a set of unlabelled weights by weight using only a balance scale requires a comparison sort algorithm. A comparison sort is a type of sorting algorithm that only reads the list elements through a single abstract comparison operation (often a "less than or equal to" operator or a three-way comparison) that determines which of two elements should occur first in the final sorted list.
The optimal algorithm is by Andris Ambainis. [7] Yaoyun Shi first proved a tight lower bound when the size of the range is sufficiently large. [8] Ambainis [9] and Kutin [10] independently (and via different proofs) extended his work to obtain the lower bound for all functions.
In others words, the sample complexity (,,) defines the rate of consistency of the algorithm: given a desired accuracy and confidence , one needs to sample (,,) data points to guarantee that the risk of the output function is within of the best possible, with probability at least .
To show a lower bound of () for a problem requires showing that no algorithm can have time complexity lower than (). Upper and lower bounds are usually stated using the big O notation, which hides constant factors and smaller terms. This makes the bounds independent of the specific details of the computational model used.
Binary search Visualization of the binary search algorithm where 7 is the target value Class Search algorithm Data structure Array Worst-case performance O (log n) Best-case performance O (1) Average performance O (log n) Worst-case space complexity O (1) Optimal Yes In computer science, binary search, also known as half-interval search, logarithmic search, or binary chop, is a search ...
An equivalent description of the FFD algorithm is as follows. Order the items from largest to smallest. While there are remaining items: Open a new empty bin. For each item from largest to smallest: If it can fit into the current bin, insert it. In the standard description, we loop over the items once, but keep many open bins.
The following is the skeleton of a generic branch and bound algorithm for minimizing an arbitrary objective function f. [3] To obtain an actual algorithm from this, one requires a bounding function bound, that computes lower bounds of f on nodes of the search tree, as well as a problem-specific branching rule.