Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The problem of evil is sometimes explained as a consequence of free will. [115] [116] Free will is a source of both good and of evil, since with free will comes the potential for abuse. People with free will make their own decisions to do wrong, states Gregory Boyd, and it is they who make that choice, not God. [115]
Anagnorisis originally meant recognition in its Greek context, not only of a person but also of what that person stood for. Anagnorisis was the hero 's sudden awareness of a real situation, the realisation of things as they stood, and finally, the hero's insight into a relationship with an often antagonistic character in Aristotelian tragedy .
To be radically evil, one can no longer act in accordance to good because they determinedly follow maxims of willing that discounts good. According to Kant, a person has the choice between good maxims, rules that respect the moral law, and evil maxims, rules that contradict or opposes moral law. One that disregards, and act against moral law ...
The contrast theodicy holds that evil is needed to enable people to appreciate or understand good. The warning theodicy rationalizes evil as God's warning to people to mend their ways. A defence has been proposed by the American philosopher Alvin Plantinga , which is focused on showing the logical possibility of God's existence.
The absence of good (Latin: privatio boni), also known as the privation theory of evil, [1] is a theological and philosophical doctrine that evil, unlike good, is insubstantial, so that thinking of it as an entity is misleading. Instead, evil is rather the absence, or lack ("privation"), of good.
In such a view, behavior destructive to a person's society (either to its structures or to the persons it comprises) is bad or "evil". [63] Thus, conscience can be viewed as an outcome of those biological drives that prompt humans to avoid provoking fear or contempt in others; being experienced as guilt and shame in differing ways from society ...
Image credits: DrDreidel82 #2. The love some people have for watching sports. To edit/elaborate, I went to a Big 10 school. I honestly had no idea how much of a religion sports were to people when ...
In response to unfair or abusive behaviour from a separate individual or group to the person: "I must have done something wrong if they treat me like this." Based on anecdotal and survey evidence, John Banja states that the medical field features a disproportionate amount of rationalization invoked in the "covering up" of mistakes. [8]