When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrews_v_Law_Society_of...

    Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143 is the first Supreme Court of Canada case to deal with the equality rights provided under Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. British law graduate Mark David Andrews challenged the validity of Section 42 of the Barristers and Solicitors Act contending that the ...

  3. Supreme Court of British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_British...

    November, 2013. The Supreme Court of British Columbia is the superior trial court for the province of British Columbia, Canada. The Court hears civil and criminal law cases as well as appeals from the Provincial Court of British Columbia. There are 90 judicial positions on the Court in addition to supernumerary judges, making for a grand total ...

  4. Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_(City)_v_Ontario...

    Abella J, joined by Karakatsanis, Martin and Kasirer JJ. Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General), 2021 SCC 34, is a landmark [2][3] decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on freedom of expression and unwritten constitutional principles. By a 5–4 majority, the court held that the Government of Ontario 's decision to reduce the size of the ...

  5. Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_33_of_the_Canadian...

    Since the Court of Appeal decision was still the statement of law at the time of the SGEU Dispute Settlement Act, a clause was written into the act, invoking the section 33 override. [66] [67] [68] The earlier law was later found by the Supreme Court to be consistent with the Charter, meaning the use of the clause had been unnecessary. [67] [69]

  6. R v Jordan (2016) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Jordan_(2016)

    R. v. Jordan [2] was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which rejected the framework traditionally used to determine whether an accused was tried within a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and replaced it with a presumptive ceiling of 18 months between the charges and the trial in a provincial court without preliminary inquiry, or 30 ...

  7. Court system of Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_system_of_Canada

    The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial. The Constitution of Canada gives the federal Parliament of Canada ...

  8. Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambie_Surgeries...

    Justice John J. Steeves [1] Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia [2020 BCSC 1310] was a high-profile, multi-year Supreme Court of British Columbia (BCSC) case brought by Brian Day, an advocate for private healthcare, against the province of British Columbia. Day, who runs the Vancouver -based private clinic Cambie Surgery Centre ...

  9. British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_(Public...

    British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union [1999] 3 SCR 3, 1999 SCC 48 – called Meiorin for short – is a Supreme Court of Canada case that created a unified test to determine if a violation of human rights legislation can be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR).