When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: how to improve reputation at work meaning examples of life sciences research

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Metascience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metascience

    The EQUATOR Network was established with the goals of raising awareness of the importance of good reporting of research, assisting in the development, dissemination and implementation of reporting guidelines for different types of study designs, monitoring the status of the quality of reporting of research studies in the health sciences ...

  3. Employee engagement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_engagement

    Managers are supposed to foster strategies that keep employees engaged, motivated and dedicated to their work. Worklife balance at the individual level has been found to predict a highly engaged and productive workforce. [32] An important aspect of worklife balance is how well the individual feels they can balance both family and work ...

  4. Evidence-based practice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_practice

    Evidence-based practice is the idea that occupational practices ought to be based on scientific evidence.The movement towards evidence-based practices attempts to encourage and, in some instances, require professionals and other decision-makers to pay more attention to evidence to inform their decision-making.

  5. How to Build a Good Reputation at Work - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/build-good-reputation-131800150...

    Establishing a solid reputation at your company will work wonders for your career. Here are a few ways to make that happen.

  6. Science communication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_communication

    The overall effectiveness of the science communication field is limited by the lack of effective transfer mechanisms for practitioners to apply research in their work and perhaps even investigate, together with researchers, communication strategies, Jensen and Gerber said. [8]

  7. Rankings of academic publishers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankings_of_academic...

    [17] [18] [19] In a Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology article, Howard D. White et al. wrote: "Bibliometric measures for evaluating research units in the book-oriented humanities and social sciences are underdeveloped relative to those available for journal-oriented science and technology".

  8. Reputation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reputation

    The reputation or prestige of a social entity (a person, a social group, an organization, or a place) is an opinion about that entity – typically developed as a result of social evaluation on a set of criteria, such as behavior or performance. [1] Reputation is a ubiquitous, spontaneous, and highly efficient mechanism of social control. [2]

  9. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...