When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumers'_Research_v...

    Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 21-3886 (2023), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, on a challenge by Consumers' Research, a free-market advocacy organization, against the Federal Communications Commission's Universal Service Fund program.

  3. Taylor v. City of Saginaw - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._City_of_Saginaw

    In Taylor v.City of Saginaw, et al., No. 17-2126 (6th Cir. 2019), [1] the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the practice of “chalking” in which parking enforcement officers apply chalk to mark the tires of parked vehicles in order to track the duration of time for which those vehicles have been parked, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment to the ...

  4. Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit_Free_Press_v._Ashcroft

    Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft was a case that was heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in August 2002. The plaintiffs, Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, Michigan Representative John Conyers, and Rabih Haddad argued that it was a violation of the First Amendment for the defendants, Attorney General Ashcroft, Chief Immigration Judge Creppy, and Immigration Judge ...

  5. Tennessee v. FCC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._FCC

    Tennessee v. Federal Communications Commission, 832 F.3d 597 (2016), was a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, [1] holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have the authority to preempt states from enforcing "anti-expansion" statutes that prohibit local municipal broadband networks from being expanded into nearby communities.

  6. American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties...

    The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on the government's appeal on January 31, 2007. [15] In its July 6, 2007 decision, the circuit court overturned Judge Taylor's ruling in a 2–1 vote. The majority declined to rule on the legality of the program, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the ...

  7. Alerding v. Ohio High School Athletic Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alerding_v._Ohio_High...

    Alerding v. Ohio High School Athletic Association, 779 F.2d 315 (6th Cir. 1985) [1] was a court case heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which held that the right to participate in interscholastic sports is not a fundamental privilege protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution.

  8. Taubman Co. v. Webfeats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taubman_Co._v._Webfeats

    Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, 319 F.3d 770, 778 (6th Cir. 2003) was a United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit case concerning trademark infringement under the Lanham Act due to the unauthorized use of a domain name and website.

  9. Parks v. LaFace Records - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parks_v._LaFace_Records

    Parks v. LaFace Records, 329 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 2003), was a lawsuit filed by attorney Gregory J Reed in March 1999 on Rosa Parks' behalf against American hip-hop duo Outkast and LaFace Records, claiming that the group had illegally used Parks' name without her permission for the song "Rosa Parks", the most successful radio single of Outkast's 1998 album Aquemini.