Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, often abbreviated to Putnam Competition, is an annual mathematics competition for undergraduate college students enrolled at institutions of higher learning in the United States and Canada (regardless of the students' nationalities).
It is easy to prove that R(4, 2) = 4, and, more generally, that R(s, 2) = s for all s: a graph on s − 1 nodes with all edges coloured red serves as a counterexample and proves that R(s, 2) ≥ s; among colourings of a graph on s nodes, the colouring with all edges coloured red contains a s-node red subgraph, and all other colourings contain a ...
Features of the argument that Putnam came to disagree with include its reliance on a single, regimented, best theory. [108] In 1975, Putnam formulated his own indispensability argument based on the no miracles argument in the philosophy of science, which argues the success of science can only be explained by scientific realism without being ...
Hilbert's problems are 23 problems in mathematics ... Hilary Putnam, ... since arguably Weil was the mathematician of the 1940s and 1950s who best played the Hilbert ...
Sounds fine to me. Perhaps the main article can list the most recent winners (team and individual) and provide an internal link to the list, as you say. I would think your best bet is to separate the two -- Putnam, Putnam/Fellows, Putnam/Top Scoring Teams. Rjyanco 19:03, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
In logic and computer science, the Davis–Putnam–Logemann–Loveland (DPLL) algorithm is a complete, backtracking-based search algorithm for deciding the satisfiability of propositional logic formulae in conjunctive normal form, i.e. for solving the CNF-SAT problem.
G.P. Putnam's Sons "Love Poems for Married People" by John Kenney ... smooth and rugged edges to help him slice his way out of any problem. $18 at Amazon ... you to pack down all of your clothes ...
Algorithm DP SAT solver Input: A set of clauses Φ. Output: A Truth Value: true if Φ can be satisfied, false otherwise. function DP-SAT(Φ) repeat // unit propagation: while Φ contains a unit clause {l} do for every clause c in Φ that contains l do Φ ← remove-from-formula(c, Φ); for every clause c in Φ that contains ¬l do Φ ← remove-from-formula(c, Φ); Φ ← add-to-formula(c ...