Ad
related to: prenatal causes of cerebral palsy birth rates
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Without treatment, there is an almost 100% mortality rate of one or all fetuses. [1] Even with treatment, the condition is associated with premature birth and a risk of cerebral palsy in a surviving fetus. Around 5–15% of identical twin fetuses will go on to develop TTTS. [2]
This is associated with cerebral palsy and is suggestive of a hypercoagulable state as the underlying cause. Cerebral palsy is due to abnormal development or damage occurring to the developing brain. [72] This damage can occur during pregnancy, delivery, the first month of life, or less commonly in early childhood. [72]
A large study followed children born between 22 and 25 weeks until the age of 6 years old. Of these children, 46% had moderate to severe disabilities such as cerebral palsy, vision or hearing loss and learning disabilities, 34% had mild disabilities, and 20% had no disabilities; 12% had disabling cerebral palsy. [192]
Infections like chorioamnionitis cause an infection in the maternal blood, commonly leading to premature birth and the newborn experiencing brain damage, meningitis, or death. [29] Other infections include neonatal sepsis, where the immune system reacts by affecting their organs and tissues resulting in meningitis, seizures, and cerebral palsy ...
Adults born preterm have higher all-cause mortality rates as compared to full-term adults. Premature birth is associated with a 1.2x to 1.6x increase in all-cause mortality rates during early to mid-adulthood. Those born extremely prematurely (22–27 weeks) have an even higher mortality rate of 1.9x to 4.0x. [3]
Babies born before 37 weeks are "preterm" and at higher risk of health problems such as cerebral palsy ... can cause premature birth ... Pregnancy rates are 140 per ...
The percentage of individuals with PVL who develop cerebral palsy is generally reported with significant variability from study to study, with estimates ranging from 20% to more than 60%. [ 2 ] [ 6 ] One of the reasons for this discrepancy is the large variability in severity of cerebral palsy.
Relatively large studies that have tried to quantify long-term effects of cord prolapse on children found that less than 1% (1 in 120 studied) had a major neurologic disability, [10] and less than 1% (110 in 16,675) had diagnosed cerebral palsy.