Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [1] prescribes the law relating to contracts in India and is the key regulating Indian contract law. Then the principles of English Common Law. It is applicable to all the states of India. It determines the circumstances in which promises made by the parties to a contract shall be legally binding.
Contract law, minority, mortgage Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose , [1903] UKPC 12, is a major Indian contract law case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council . The case held that a contract entered into by a minor is totally void.
With complete case-law, explanatory and critical comments, High Court rules, forms of conveyances and seven useful appendices, and Easements Act, with notes of English and Indian cases ... Third edition, etc; A Manual of the Indian Succession Act and other minor Acts prescribed for the L.L.B. [sic] Examination ...
State Armed Police Forces (Extension of Laws) Act: 1952: 63 Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act: 1952: 74 Scheduled Areas (Assimilation of Laws) Act: 1953: 16 Salaries and Allowances of Officers of Parliament Act: 1953: 20 Tea Act: 1953: 29 Andhra State Act: 1953: 30 Calcutta High Court (Extension of Jurisdiction) Act: 1953: 41 Coir Industry Act ...
Indian Contract law is popularly known as mercantile law of India. Originally Indian Sales of Goods Act and Partnership Act were part of Indian Contract act, but due to needed amendment these acts were separated from Contract Act. The Contract act occupies the most important place in legal agreements in India.
Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla CIE (1868 – 26 April 1934), [2] also known as Dinshaw Mulla, was an Indian lawyer, legal writer, and judge. D.F Mulla was an Attorney-at-Law of the Bombay High Court and was a professor of law at Government Law College, Bombay and a member of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council , India.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Name of the case Year Judgement Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [22] 1978 A 'procedure' under Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be arbitrary, unfair, oppressive, or unreasonable. A law depriving a person of 'personal liberty' must not violate any of the Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. This judgement thus overruled A. K. Gopalan v.