Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 22, 1999. The Court decided that mitigating measures should be taken into account when determining whether one's impairment constitutes a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA).
Case name Citation Date decided Neder v. United States: 527 U.S. 1: June 10, 1999 Chicago v. Morales: 527 U.S. 41: 1999: Lilly v. Virginia: 527 U.S. 116: 1999 ...
Sutton v. United States: 575 (1921) Brandeis none none Ct. Cl. affirmed District of Columbia v. Andrews Paper Company: 582 (1921) Clarke none none D.C. Cir. reversed Dane v. Jackson: 589 (1921) Clarke none none Mass. affirmed Oklahoma v. Texas: 602 (1921) per curiam: none none original: continued Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v ...
Jury convicts Warner Robins office manager in $200K embezzlement scheme. Alba Rosa. July 1, 2024 at 3:23 PM. ... She could face 30 years and a $1 million fine for bank fraud, 20 years and a ...
James K. Couture, who was 42 as of his original June 2021 indictment, is currently being held without bail in federal prison as a judge mulls whether to release him, records show.
Case name Citation Date decided Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc. 328 U.S. 1: 1946: Illinois ex rel. Gordon v. United States: 328 U.S. 8: 1946: El Dorado Oil Works v.
WORCESTER - Former Sutton contractor Sean J. Brennan, wanted in Worcester for skipping charges of theft, is still on the run from authorities eight months later. “It’s ridiculous,” said ...
The first decision—by the Supreme Court in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.—stated that impairments must be considered in their mitigated state. [10] The second decision in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams narrowed the definition of "disability" to just those impairments that impact tasks of daily living. [11]