When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The case first went to the Divisional Court, where Hooper LJ and Cresswell J decided in favour of Bancoult on 11 May 2006. The court found that the "interests of BIOT must be or must primarily be those whose right of abode and unrestricted right to enter and remain was being in effect removed", and that as Section 9 of the Constitutional Order ...

  3. Divisional court (England and Wales) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisional_court_(England...

    A divisional court, in relation to the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, means a court sitting with at least two judges. [1] Matters heard by a divisional court include some criminal cases in the High Court (including appeals from magistrates' courts and in extradition proceedings) as well as certain judicial review cases.

  4. Challenges to decisions of England and Wales magistrates ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenges_to_decisions_of...

    The Divisional Court may reverse, affirm or amend the decision of the magistrates' court, or remit the case to the magistrates' court. [17] The Divisional Court may make any order as it sees fit. [17] The appellant has no right to bail but may be granted bail by the magistrates' court [11] or, if the magistrates' court refuses, a judge of the ...

  5. Fixed Budget vs. Flexible Budget: What’s the Difference and ...

    www.aol.com/fixed-budget-vs-flexible-budget...

    Fixed budgets and flexible budgets are well-known concepts in business accounting. But you can also apply these budgeting principles to personal finance and your own spending. Keep reading to ...

  6. Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagan_v_Metropolitan...

    Court: Divisional court (England and Wales) Full case name: Regina v. (usually spoken as The Crown and or against) Vincent Martel Fagan : Decided: 31 July 1968: Citation [1969] 1 QB 439, [1968] 3 All ER 442, [1968] 3 WLR 1120, 52 Cr App R 700: Case history; Prior action: Conviction by Willesden magistrates in 1967, upheld in Middlesex Quarter ...

  7. R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Corner_House_Research...

    39. The decision of the then Attorney General to release Leila Khalid to avert a threat by the PLO to execute Swiss and German hostages was described as "clearly defensible" in Edwards, The Attorney General, Politics and the Public Interest (1984), p 325, and is not criticised by the Divisional Court. It is perhaps the only occasion on which a ...

  8. High Court of Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice

    The Royal Courts of Justice on the Strand in the City of Westminster. The High Court of Justice was established in 1875 by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873.The Act merged eight existing English courts – the Court of Chancery, the Court of King's Bench, the Court of Common Pleas, the Court of Exchequer, the High Court of Admiralty, the Court of Probate, the Court for Divorce and ...

  9. Oxford v Moss - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_v_Moss

    Oxford v Moss (1979) is an English criminal law case, dealing with theft of intangible property: information.A divisional court of High Court, to whom the legal question of the taking of a proof (final draft) exam paper was referred by magistrates, and which is not one of binding precedent, ruled that information could not be deemed to be intangible property and therefore was incapable of ...