Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich 459; 170 NW 668 (1919), [1] is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.
Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88, 118 N.E. 214 (N.Y. 1917): A contract for exclusive representation implied consideration. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919): Owners of a company with investors have a duty to operate the business for profitable purposes as opposed to charitable purposes. Meinhard v.
Ford petitioned the results of their exhausted state appeals to the Supreme Court in 2019, asking the question if the "arise out of or relate to" requirement of the Due Process Clause is met even when none of their state activities caused the claims in the plaintiffs' cases. The Supreme Court agreed in January 2020 to hear both cases ...
The policy underlying a defendant’s right to removal is to prevent any potential bias by the state court in favor of a local plaintiff. Getting Out of Dodge: Removing a Case From State to ...
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
Shlensky v Wrigley, 237 NE 2d 776 (Ill. App. 1968) is a leading US corporate law case concerning the board's discretion to determine how to balance stakeholders' interests. The case embraces the application of the business judgment rule to directors' good-faith judgments about long-term shareholder value. [ 1 ]
Nvidia, the AI-chip giant, petitioned the nation's highest court after a lower court permitted a 2018 class action lawsuit to move ahead.
Get the Moses Lake, WA local weather forecast by the hour and the next 10 days.