Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
When is Wikipedia useful for research? Wikipedia , like other encyclopedias , provides a general overview of most subjects in its scope. Wikipedia's scope includes all human knowledge, so we have articles about topics as diverse as science, local history, and popular culture.
Citation of Wikipedia in research papers has been known to result in a failing grade. [2] [3] [4] This does not mean Wikipedia is not useful: Wikipedia articles contain many links to newspaper articles, books (often with ISBN numbers), radio programming, television shows, Web
Most research begins with a general statement of the problem, or rather, the purpose for engaging in the study. [34] The literature review identifies flaws or holes in previous research which provides justification for the study. Often, a literature review is conducted in a given subject area before a research question is identified. A gap in ...
Wikipedia has been the center of a much heated and critical debate in academia pertaining to the relevance, accuracy, and effectiveness of using information found online in academic research, especially in places where information is constantly being created, revised, and deleted by people of various backgrounds, ranging from experts to curious learners.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.
There are a wide variety of backgrounds from which people approach studying Wikipedia. Academics: the students, professors, and staff of colleges and universities; Industry researchers: the staff of private companies; Independents: individuals without an affiliation with an interest in studying Wikipedia
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia — each article is meant to provide its readers with "a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject", from a neutral point of view. While Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research, nor an original synthesis of the research literature, you may do this on Wikipedia's sister projects.
Editing an article in Wikipedia is not like writing an original research article for an academic journal, nor it is like writing an analytical literature review article where you synthesize a story from original research papers; instead, it should be more like an objective summary or annotated bibliography of the subject, which provides ...