Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Fantasy-prone personality (FPP) is a disposition or personality trait in which a person experiences a lifelong, extensive, and deep involvement in fantasy. [1] This disposition is an attempt, at least in part, to better describe "overactive imagination " or "living in a dream world ". [ 2 ]
Absorption is a disposition or personality trait in which a person becomes absorbed in their mental imagery, particularly fantasy. [1] This trait thus correlates highly with a fantasy prone personality. The original research on absorption was by Dutch American psychologist Auke Tellegen. [2]
Persons with a fantasy-prone personality spend a significant portion of their lives involved in fantasy and may confuse or mix their fantasies with their real life. [11] Though they are otherwise healthy, normally functioning adults, they simultaneously experience complex fantasy lives. [12]
Some interpret it as a sign that they've predicted it before, or lived it in a past life. ... highly fantasy-prone people are more susceptible to hallucinations and false memories that might lead ...
The character is also related to that of having a fantasy-prone personality. [20] The story has been adapted twice into film, in 1947 by Norman Z. McLeod [21] and again in 2013 by Ben Stiller. [22] In What Remains of Edith Finch, released in 2017, compulsive daydreaming is shown as the cause of death to the character Lewis. [23]
Through the daydream, which involved many fantastical elements, characteristics such as a fear of men or a desire to subdue a selfish personality trait were often revealed. [ 21 ] Self-focused daydreaming can be positive (i.e. a self-reflection ) or negative (i.e. a rumination ). [ 17 ]
The data has shown a link between the OBE experience in some cases to fantasy prone personality (FPP). [70] In a case study involving 167 participants the findings revealed that those who claimed to have experienced the OBE were "more fantasy prone, higher in their belief in the paranormal and displayed greater somatoform dissociation."
Hypnotic susceptibility scales, which mainly developed in experimental settings, were preceded by more primitive scales, developed within clinical practice, which were intended to infer the "depth" or "level" of "hypnotic trance" on the basis of various subjective, behavioural or physiological changes.