Ads
related to: philosophy books by subject matter
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Ned Block (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, 1981; Mario Bunge and Rubén Ardilla, Philosophy of Psychology, 1987; Paul E. Meehl, "Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology", 1992; Steven Pinker, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, 2002
The Century (book) Chinese Gung Fu: The Philosophical Art of Self-Defense; Cinema and Death: on Image and Immortality; The City of God; The Closing of the American Mind; Commentaries on Living; The Concept of Mind; The Conditions of Philosophy; The Conscious Mind; The Consolations of Philosophy; A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy
Books in philosophy of technology (70 P) This page was last edited on 10 October 2024, at 13:22 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution ...
A Berlin Republic – A Buyer's Market – A Calendar of Wisdom – A Clockwork Orange – A Conflict of Visions – A Darwinian Left – A Defence of Common Sense – A Defense of Abortion – A Dissertation on Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain – A Few Words on Non-Intervention – A Fórmula de Deus – A General View of Positivism – A Grief Observed – A Guide for the Perplexed ...
Philosophy books by topic (20 C) A. Applied philosophy (14 C, 14 P) L. Philosophy of logic (9 C, 24 P) Pages in category "Philosophy by topic" The following 21 pages ...
Frankfurt originally published the essay "On Bullshit" in the Raritan Quarterly Review in 1986. Nineteen years later, it was published as the book On Bullshit (2005), which proved popular among lay readers; the book appeared for 27 weeks on The New York Times Best Seller list [3] and was discussed on the television show The Daily Show With Jon Stewart, [4] [5] as well as in an online interview.
The economist Tyler Cowen has expressed admiration for Parfit's style ("Reading him is an unforgettable and illuminating experience") in On What Matters, but argues: . I see the biggest and most central part of the book as a failure, possibly wrong but more worryingly "not even wrong" and simply missing the questions defined by where the frontier – choice theory and not just philosophic ...
That the acceptable ideas change and develop in the course of time, manifested as paradigm shifts of intellectualism, for instance between the "Classical Age" [1] and "Modernity" (from Kant onwards) — which is the period considered by Foucault in the book — is support for the thesis that every historical period has underlying epistemic ...