Ad
related to: aiac model arbitration clause example sentence
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In contract law, an arbitration clause is a clause in a contract that requires the parties to resolve their disputes through an arbitration process. Although such a clause may or may not specify that arbitration occur within a specific jurisdiction, it always binds the parties to a type of resolution outside the courts, and is therefore considered a kind of forum selection clause.
Sundra Rajoo and W S W Davidson. The Arbitration Act 2005: UNCITRAL Model Law as Applied in Malaysia. Sweet & Maxwell Asia. 2007. Reviewed at (2008) 10 Asian Dispute Review 32 and (2007) 15 IIUM Law Journal 149; Sundra Rajoo and W S W Davidson, "The Malaysian Arbitration Act 2005 and the UNCITRAL Model Law" (2006) 8 Asian Dispute Review 80
In contract law, a forum selection clause (sometimes called a dispute resolution clause, choice of court clause, governing law clause, jurisdiction clause or an arbitration clause, depending on its form) in a contract with a conflict of laws element allows the parties to agree that any disputes relating to that contract will be resolved in a specific forum.
The model law is not binding, but individual states may adopt the model law by incorporating it into their domestic law (as, for example, Australia did, in the International Arbitration Act 1974, as amended). [2] The model law was published in English and in French. Translations in all six United Nations languages now exist. [3]
In keeping with the informality of the arbitration process, the law is generally keen to uphold the validity of arbitration clauses even when they lack the normal formal language associated with legal contracts. Clauses which have been upheld include: "arbitration in London – English law to apply" [19] "suitable arbitration clause" [20]
So-called forced arbitration clauses say that in the event of a dispute, you won't be able to file a class-action suit. Instead, your dispute will be settled one-on-one in a private arbitration forum.
Arbitration clauses may potentially be challenged as unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable. [24] Typically, the validity of an arbitration clause is decided by a court rather than an arbitrator. However, if the validity of the entire arbitration agreement is in dispute, then the issue is decided by the arbitrators in the first instance.
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning arbitration of antitrust claims. The Court heard the case on appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which had ruled that the arbitration clause in a Puerto Rican car dealer's franchise agreement was broad enough to reach its ...