When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_use_or...

    In cases such as these, an "other stuff exists"–type of argument or rationale may provide the necessary precedent for style and phraseology. For instance, upon the sudden death of the actor Heath Ledger in 2008, a discussion broke out about adding "the late" before his name in the article on The Dark Knight , a film in which he had a major role.

  3. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    This page details arguments that are commonly seen in deletion discussions that have been identified as generally unsound and unconvincing. These are arguments that should generally be avoided – or at the least supplemented with a better-grounded rationale for the position taken, whether that be "keep", "delete" or some other objective.

  4. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid on discussion pages

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    Unlike a deletion discussion, where people "vote" with terms like "keep," "delete," and a variety of other actions, talk page discussions are not as formal and can follow any number of structures. The examples below use terms like "include" and "remove" just to get the point across. But a real discussion may appear quite differently.

  5. Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_really...

    A favourite line from a movie or catchy lyric, a potent phrase used in argument, juicy facts of interest to fans, a punch-line or zinger; these are all very interesting, but usually all that can be informatively written about topic "X" is: "X is a _____ found in _____." Just about everything listed on Wikipedia:Millionth topic pool.

  6. Wikipedia talk:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:When_to_use...

    The new title is "When to use or avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments". If the answer to "when to use" was "never", that would be a strange title to use to make things clearer - surely something like "Avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments" would have been far better. That conversation only closed on May 6 - less than two weeks ago.

  7. Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in place and transportation ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    It is quite common for these to face various arguments to be kept or deleted, regardless of what the guidelines state. In addition to the common arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, the following is a list of arguments that are not recommended when participating in such a discussion:

  8. Help:Searching/Features - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Searching/Features

    For that there is a deepcat search parameter, available by adding a line to your javaScript and CSS files. [15] Multiple categories may be applied up to the 300-character limit of a query. Because many pages outside the mainspace are also categorized, the counts often won't match the category unless the search domain is the entire wiki:

  9. Wikipedia:Link rot - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Link_rot

    Following a page move or page deletion, links to Wikipedia pages from other websites may break. In most page moves, a redirect will remain at the old page—this won't cause a problem. But if a page is completely deleted or usurped (i.e. replaced with other content) then link rot will have been caused on any external websites that link to it.