When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of X Window System desktop environments

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_X_Window...

    What is the difference between Gnome, KDE, Xfce & LXDE pclosmag.com; Should You Use a Window Manager as Your Desktop Environment? makeuseof.com; Six Popular Linux Desktop Environments techspot.com; 10 Best and Most Popular Linux Desktop Environments of All Time tecmint.com; 5 Best Linux Desktop Environments With Pros & Cons linuxandubuntu.com

  3. Comparison of X window managers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_X_window...

    Metacity (GNOME) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Mutter (GNOME/MeeGo) Yes Yes Yes Yes Gnome Shell No Yes Moody: Motif Window Manager (mwm) No No Yes No [h] Openbox: Yes Depends [c] Yes Yes Depends [c] No Yes PekWM: Yes No Yes Partial No Yes Yes PlayWM [citation needed] Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Qtile: Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Ragnar: Ratpoison: No No ...

  4. Desktop environment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_environment

    Most commonly used lightweight desktop environments include LXDE and Xfce; they both use GTK+, which is the same underlying toolkit GNOME uses. The MATE desktop environment, a fork of GNOME 2, is comparable to Xfce in its use of RAM and processor cycles, but is often considered more as an alternative to other lightweight desktop environments.

  5. Comparison of BSD operating systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BSD...

    Easy to use, full FreeBSD w/ GNOME, Mate, Xfce, LXDE or Openbox. FuryBSD Joe Maloney 2019-10-24 FreeBSD: 12.1-2020090701 (2020Q3) 2019-12-02 Free BSD: Desktop, Workstation: Easy to use, full FreeBSD w/ Xfce or KDE. DesktopBSD: Peter Hofer, Daniel Seuffert 2005-07-25 FreeBSD: 1.7 2009-09-07 Free BSD: Desktop Easy to use ClosedBSD

  6. Comparison of Linux distributions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux...

    This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.The specific problem is: Active distributions composed entirely of free software (Dragora GNU/Linux-Libre, gNewSense, Guix System, LibreCMC, Musix GNU+Linux, Parabola GNU/Linux-libre, and Trisquel) need information in all sub categories, #General is complete.

  7. X window manager - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_window_manager

    Xfce's Xfwm (since 4.2 of 2004 [citation needed] or 2005 Xfce 4.2.0 released!), Unity's Compiz (since 2005—was forked as Beryl in 2006 but the projects re-merged in 2007), and; KDE's KWin (since 4.0 of 2008). Compositing support can be added to non-compositing window managers, through the use of compositors such as compton.

  8. Talk : Comparison of X Window System desktop environments

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_X...

    Im doing a lot of test in my new Arch linux and i see kde very high in mem use but fster than gnome and xfce the king of speed but kde the king of visual effects. what about the speed and mem needs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.56.30.80 ( talk ) 18:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]

  9. Xfce - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfce

    Thunar is the default file manager for Xfce, replacing Xffm. It resembles GNOME's Nautilus, and is designed for speed and a low memory footprint, [48] as well as being highly customizable through plugins. Xfce also has a lightweight archive manager called Xarchiver, but this is not part of the core Xfce 4.4.0. [49]