Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Titin is the third most abundant protein in muscle (after myosin and actin), and an adult human contains approximately 0.5 kg of titin. [13] With its length of ~27,000 to ~35,000 amino acids (depending on the splice isoform ), titin is the largest known protein . [ 14 ]
Even the smallest proteins contain no fewer than 20 amino acids, making for some pretty long names in their own right; titin, however, is the human body’s largest protein. Total amino acid count ...
The IUPAC name for Titin. This is the largest known protein and so has the longest chemical name. Written in full, it contains 189,819 letters. [48] MOM: A functional group often employed in organic synthesis to protect alcohols. Periplanone B: Periplanone B A pheromone of the female American cockroach. Thebacon
The 58-letter name Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch is the name of a town on Anglesey, an island of Wales. In terms of the traditional Welsh alphabet, the name is only 51 letters long, as certain digraphs in Welsh are considered as single letters, for instance ll, ng and ch. It is generally ...
The longest recognized systematic name is for the protein titin, at 189,819 letters. [1] While lexicographers regard generic names of chemical compounds as verbal formulae rather than words, [ 2 ] for its sheer length the systematic name for titin is often included in longest-word lists.
No legitimate biologist would consider the full name of titin even remotely useful. That said, let's imagine that laypeople comprise 100% of the titin article's readership. Let's say that all of them are here because they've heard that the full name of titin is the longest word in English. Does that mean this article should contain the word?
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Which is the correct name? All of them. What makes one arbitrarily chosen name so special? Adding the full name has increased the size of this article by more than ten fold (24,341 → 344,379 bytes) and hence has unnecessarily increased the load times. This is especially annoying to editors that are trying to improve the article.