When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    A formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow") is a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument that renders the argument invalid. The flaw can be expressed in the standard system of logic. [ 1 ]

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Naturalistic fallacy fallacy is a type of argument from fallacy. Straw man fallacy – refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. [110] Texas sharpshooter fallacy – improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data. [111]

  4. Straw man - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

    A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. [1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

  5. Slippery slope - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

    [citation needed] When the initial step is not demonstrably likely to result in the claimed effects, this is called the slippery slope fallacy. This is a type of informal fallacy , and is a subset of continuum fallacy , in that it ignores the possibility of middle ground and assumes a discrete transition from category A to category B.

  6. Paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox

    Formal fallacy – Faulty deductive reasoning due to a logical flaw; Four-valued logic – Any logic with four truth values; Impossible object – Type of optical illusion; Category:Mathematical paradoxes; List of paradoxes – List of statements that appear to contradict themselves; Mu (negative) – Term meaning 'not', 'without', or 'lack'

  7. Argument from authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

    An argument from authority [a] is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority figure (or figures) is used as evidence to support an argument. [1]The argument from authority is a logical fallacy, [2] and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible.

  8. Informal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy

    The fallacy of begging the question, on this perspective, is a fallacy because it fails to expand our knowledge by providing independent justification for its conclusion. Instead, the conclusion is already assumed in one of its premises.

  9. Formal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy

    Logical fallacy: Since most of the green is touching red, and most of the red is touching blue, most of the green must be touching blue. This, however, is a false statement. In the strictest sense, a logical fallacy is the incorrect application of a valid logical principle or an application of a nonexistent principle: Most Rimnars are Jornars.