When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: case law on identifying passengers on train in ohio state

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. New York v. Belton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Belton

    New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.

  3. Category:Supreme Court of Ohio cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  4. Ohio State Limited - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_Limited

    The Ohio State Limited was a named passenger train operated by the New York Central Railroad (NYC) between New York City and Cincinnati, Ohio, via Buffalo and Cleveland, Ohio. Service began in 1924 and continued until 1967, with some vestiges remaining until 1971.

  5. Category:Ohio state case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Ohio_state_case_law

    Pages in category "Ohio state case law" The following 11 pages are in this category, out of 11 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. C. City of Norwood v ...

  6. Video shows what led to reporter’s arrest at Ohio train ...

    www.aol.com/news/video-shows-led-reporter-arrest...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    "Stop and identify" laws in different states that appear to be nearly identical may be different in effect because of interpretations by state courts. For example, California "stop and identify" law, Penal Code §647(e) had wording [37] [38] [39] similar to the Nevada law upheld in Hiibel, but a California appellate court, in People v.

  8. Kolender v. Lawson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolender_v._Lawson

    Case history; Prior: 658 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1981): Holding; The statute, as drafted and as construed by the state court, is unconstitutionally vague on its face within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to clarify what is contemplated by the requirement that a suspect provide a "credible and reliable" identification.

  9. Ohio train derailment: East Palestine residents launch wave ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-train-derailment-east-palestine...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us