When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Four Evangelists - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Evangelists

    The four winged creatures symbolize, top to bottom, left to right: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Matthew the Evangelist, the author of the first gospel account, is symbolized by a winged man, or angel. Matthew's gospel starts with Joseph's genealogy from Abraham; it represents Jesus's incarnation, and so Christ's human nature. This signifies ...

  3. Synoptic Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synoptic_Gospels

    Double tradition explained entirely by Luke's use of Matthew. Three‑source (Mark–Q/Matthew) A hybrid of Two-source and Farrer. Q may be limited to sayings, may be in Aramaic, and may also be a source for Mark. Wilke (MarkLuke) Double tradition explained entirely by Matthew's use of Luke. Four-source (Mark–Q/M/L) Matthew and Luke used Q.

  4. Farrer hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrer_hypothesis

    However, postulating Luke's acquaintance with the gospel of Matthew overcomes these same problems and gives the source for the common material. The most notable argument for the Farrer hypothesis is that there are many passages where the text of Matthew and Luke agree in making small changes to that of Mark (what is called the double tradition ...

  5. Marcan priority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

    A modern tweak of this view that maintains Matthaean priority is the two-gospel (Griesbach) hypothesis which holds that Mark used both Matthew and Luke as a source (thus, in order, MatthewLukeMark). [23] This view envisions a Mark who mostly collected the common material shared between Matthew and Luke.

  6. Four-document hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-document_hypothesis

    The four-document hypothesis or four-source hypothesis is an explanation for the relationship between the three Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.It posits that there were at least four sources to the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke: the Gospel of Mark and three lost sources (Q, M, and L).

  7. Criticism of the Book of Mormon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Criticism_of_the_Book_of_Mormon

    Critics believe Joseph Smith came up with all the names in the Book of Mormon, noting that Joseph owned a King James Bible with a table listing all the names used in the Bible. [51] [52] Many Book of Mormon names are either biblical, formed from a rhyming pattern, or changed by a prefix or suffix.

  8. Outline of the Book of Mormon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_the_Book_of_Mormon

    The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the Book of Mormon: . The Book of Mormon is a sacred text of the Latter Day Saint movement, which adherents believe contains writings of ancient prophets who lived on the American continent from approximately 2200 BC to AD 421.

  9. Two-gospel hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-gospel_hypothesis

    Almost all of Mark's content is found in Matthew, and much of Mark is similarly found in Luke. Additionally, Matthew and Luke have a large amount of material in common that is not found in Mark. The hypothesis states that Matthew was written first, while Christianity was still centered in Jerusalem , to calm the hostility between Jews and ...