When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. PROTECT Act of 2003 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

    The first conviction of a person found to have violated the sections of the act relating to virtual child pornography was Dwight Whorley of Virginia, who used computers at the Virginia Employment Commission to download "Japanese anime style cartoons of children engaged in explicit sexual conduct with adults" [29] alleged to depict "children ...

  3. United States v. Williams (2008) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams...

    United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography [1] (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child ...

  4. Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in...

    [21] [22] He was also convicted of possessing child pornography involving real children. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison. [23] On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. [24] The court stated that "it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually ...

  5. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech...

    Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down two overbroad provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech". [2]

  6. Nelson v. Colorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_v._Colorado

    Nelson v. Colorado, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. [1] In a 7-1 decision written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that a state had no right to keep fines and other money based on an invalid conviction. [2]

  7. SNL’s Trump hilariously impersonates ex-president’s ‘reaction ...

    www.aol.com/snl-trump-hilariously-reacts-guilty...

    Saturday Night Live’s Donald Trump was resurrected after the former president was found guilty in a high-profile hush-money trial.. Many celebrities, including Robert De Niro, are all reacting ...

  8. Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy,_Vicky,_and_Andy_Child...

    It creates a Child Pornography Victims Reserve Fund within the federal Crime Victims Fund using assessments from defendants convicted of child pornography offenses and set-aside funds. [7] Victims of child pornography trafficking are entitled to receive a one-time payment of $35,000 from this fund instead of fighting for restitution if they so ...

  9. Trump verdict was about one thing: Democrats being able to ...

    www.aol.com/trump-verdict-one-thing-democrats...

    Donald Trump, convicted felon. In the end, those four words are all that matter about the verdicts delivered Thursday against the former president.Democrats have lusted for the phrase, eager to ...