Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Online translations of the Epistle to the Colossians: Collection of translations and commentary on Colossians; Colossians public domain audiobook at LibriVox Various versions including Greek Translation; English Translation with Parallel Latin Vulgate; Online Bible at GospelHall.org (ESV, KJV, Darby, American Standard Version, Bible in Basic ...
In Gnosticism the use becomes more technical, though its applications are still very variable. The Gnostic writers appeal to the use in the NT (evidenced in Irenaeus' account of their views and his corresponding refutation, Iren I. iii. 4), and the word retains from it the sense of totality in contrast to the constituent parts; but the chief associations of pleroma in their systems are with ...
Yet others defend the "traditional" interpretation; Daniel B. Wallace calls the alternative "probably not the best translation." [15] Some modern English versions of the Bible renders theopneustos with "God-breathed" or "breathed out by God" , avoiding the word inspiration, which has the Latin root inspīrāre - "to blow or breathe into". [16]
Two different models of the process of creation existed in ancient Israel. [15] In the "logos" (speech) model, God speaks and shapes unresisting dormant matter into effective existence and order (Psalm 33: "By the word of YHWH the heavens were made, and by the breath of his mouth all their hosts; he gathers up the waters like a mound, stores the Deep in vaults"); in the second, or "agon ...
The Bible then makes two basic claims: it asserts unequivocally that God cannot lie and that the Bible is the Word of God. It is primarily from a combination of these facts that the argument for inerrancy comes. [50] Stanley Grenz states that: Because God cannot lie and because scripture is inspired by God, the Bible must be wholly true.
Irenaeus (c. 130 – c. 202 AD) offered one of the earliest articulations of a cosmic Christology in his Against Heresies.In his theory of atonement, Irenaeus speaks about how all of humanity was created good but tainted by sin, but that all of creation was "recapitulated" and restored under the new headship of Christ.
The material cause—the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground. The formal or efficient cause—God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life. The final cause—man became a living soul . The question is whether Genesis 2:7 refers to two or to three distinct facts and thus whether Genesis 2:7 describes two or three distinct parts ...
"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." (cf. Gen 2:7) The text of Genesis 2:7 clearly states that God breathed into the formed man the "breath of life" and man became a living soul. He did not receive a living soul; he became one.