Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Proposition 2, also known as Prop 2 or Use Millionaire's Tax Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Housing Bonds Measure, was a California ballot proposition which was intended to allow the state to use revenue from Proposition 63, which was a 1% on incomes over $1,000,000 for mental health resources passed in 2004, towards $2,000,000,000 in revenue bonds for housing solutions and homelessness ...
Proposition 2, titled Authorizing Bonds for Public Schools and Community College Facilities, was a California ballot proposition and legislative statutes that passed in the 2024 general election on November 5, 2024. [2] The proposition authorized the issuance of $10 billion in state general obligation bonds for repair, upgrade, and construction ...
Proposition 2, also known as Prop 2 or Changes to State Budget Stabilization Fund Amendment, was a 2014 California ballot proposition that would require 1.5% of general fund revenues and a number that is equal to revenues that come from capital gains-related taxes when those tax revenues exceed 8% of general fund revenues to be put into the Budget Stabilization Fund (BSA).
Proposition 2 is a bond measure that would allow the state to borrow $10 billion to help fund repairs and upgrades at thousands of public elementary, middle and high schools and community colleges ...
A 9/25/2008 SurveyUSA poll [55] of likely California voters who have either decided or are leaning towards voting a certain way on Prop 2 gave the following results: "72% Yes, 10% No, 17% still not certain. Support for the proposition is strong among all demographic groups and in all regions of the state."
Critically, Prop. 4 will advance California’s commitment to climate justice by adhering to the Justice40 principle, meaning 40% of the funds will go to front-line communities who are hit hardest ...
The proposition would have gone into effect immediately if it had passed, meaning local bonds voted on at the November elections would only have needed 55% approval to pass. [8] Politico suggested that a lower supermajority would mean more bond measures would pass, but also that more local governments would put them on the ballot to begin with. [2]
“I have spoken with residents from states that use ranked-choice voting, and they are pleased with the system. It tends to moderate the extremes and bring more balanced representation.” | Opinion