When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: minimal facts argument debunked definition psychology for dummies

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Deflationary theory of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflationary_theory_of_truth

    Paul Horwich's minimal theory of truth, also known as minimalism, takes the primary truth-bearing entities to be propositions, rather than sentences. According to the minimalist view then, truth is indeed a property of propositions (or sentences, as the case may be) but it is so minimal and anomalous a property that it cannot be said to provide ...

  3. Eliminative materialism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliminative_materialism

    Eliminative materialism (also called eliminativism) is a materialist position in the philosophy of mind. It is the idea that the majority of mental states in folk psychology do not exist. Some supporters of eliminativism argue that no coherent neural basis will be found for many everyday psychological concepts such as belief or desire, since they are poorly defined. The argument is that ...

  4. Psychology of reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology_of_reasoning

    For example, the argument, "All young girls wear skirts; Julie is a young girl; therefore, Julie wears skirts" is valid logically, but is not sound because the first premise isn't true. The syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning in which two statements reach a logical conclusion.

  5. Transcendental argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_argument

    A transcendental argument is a kind of deductive argument that appeals to the necessary conditions that make experience and knowledge possible. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Transcendental arguments may have additional standards of justification which are more demanding than those of traditional deductive arguments. [ 3 ]

  6. Deductive reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning

    Deductive arguments are evaluated in terms of their validity and soundness. An argument is valid if it is impossible for its premises to be true while its conclusion is false. In other words, the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. An argument can be “valid” even if one or more of its premises are false.

  7. Validity (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(logic)

    A standard view is that whether an argument is valid is a matter of the argument's logical form. Many techniques are employed by logicians to represent an argument's logical form. A simple example, applied to two of the above illustrations, is the following: Let the letters 'P', 'Q', and 'S' stand, respectively, for the set of men, the set of ...

  8. 9 protein myths debunked by experts - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/9-protein-myths-debunked...

    If there’s one macronutrient that seems to be having a moment, it’s protein.There are plenty of reasons to appreciate it: While it may be best known for its work in the muscle department ...

  9. Wikipedia:Fringe theories for dummies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories...

    Fringe theories tend to be, well, fringe, so perhaps nobody debunked it: not because it is accepted, but because nobody took the work to take the fringe theory into account and explain why it is wrong. Scientists are busy people and work on full-time important projects, they can't waste their time debunking the claims of every lunatic that ...