Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Throughout this article, capital letters (such as ,,,,, and ) will denote sets.On the left hand side of an identity, typically, will be the leftmost set, will be the middle set, and
The relation "is a nontrivial divisor of " on the set of one-digit natural numbers is sufficiently small to be shown here: R dv = { (2,4), (2,6), (2,8), (3,6), (3,9), (4,8) }; for example 2 is a nontrivial divisor of 8, but not vice versa, hence (2,8) ∈ R dv, but (8,2) ∉ R dv. If R is a relation that holds for x and y one often writes xRy.
Set-builder notation can be used to describe a set that is defined by a predicate, that is, a logical formula that evaluates to true for an element of the set, and false otherwise. [2]
If M is a set or class whose elements are sets, then x is an element of the union of M if and only if there is at least one element A of M such that x is an element of A. [11] In symbols: x ∈ ⋃ M ∃ A ∈ M , x ∈ A . {\displaystyle x\in \bigcup \mathbf {M} \iff \exists A\in \mathbf {M} ,\ x\in A.}
In particular, totally ordered sets can also be referred to as "ordered sets", especially in areas where these structures are more common than posets. Some authors use different symbols than ≤ {\displaystyle \leq } such as ⊑ {\displaystyle \sqsubseteq } [ 6 ] or ⪯ {\displaystyle \preceq } [ 7 ] to distinguish partial orders from total orders.
In mathematics, the limit of a sequence of sets,, … (subsets of a common set ) is a set whose elements are determined by the sequence in either of two equivalent ways: (1) by upper and lower bounds on the sequence that converge monotonically to the same set (analogous to convergence of real-valued sequences) and (2) by convergence of a sequence of indicator functions which are themselves ...
Symmetric difference of sets A and B, denoted A B or A ⊖ B, is the set of all objects that are a member of exactly one of A and B (elements which are in one of the sets, but not in both). For instance, for the sets {1, 2, 3} and {2, 3, 4}, the symmetric difference set is {1, 4}.
Russell's paradox concerns the impossibility of a set of sets, whose members are all sets that do not contain themselves. If such a set could exist, it could neither contain itself (because its members all do not contain themselves) nor avoid containing itself (because if it did, it should be included as one of its members). [2]