When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Healthline - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthline

    While some writers have used terms like "reliable" [13] to describe Healthline, others have questioned both the quality of its content and its usability and readability. For example, the site Health News Review said a Healthline article about a new medication used promotional language copied from the drug-maker's press release, neglected to cite side effects, and framed the drug's claimed ...

  3. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 409

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Healthlinedotcom

    It may be justified to blacklist Healthline as a perpetual source of fabrication and spam. Similar to reputations in scientific publishing generally, blatant misinformation destroys confidence permanently in the rest of the source. Seeing an edit containing a Healthline source is WP:REDFLAG for revising or reverting the edit. There are no ...

  4. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    Descriptions of women's history collections from sources in the UK, as well as women's history websites. Free London Metropolitan University [65] GeoRef: Geosciences: Subscription American Geosciences Institute: Global Health: Public Health Specialist bibliographic, abstracting and indexing database dedicated to public health research and practice.

  5. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    A primary source is one in which the authors directly participated in the research and documented their personal experiences. They examined the patients, injected the rats, ran the experiments, or supervised those who did. Many papers published in medical journals are primary sources for facts about the research and discoveries made.

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/FAQ

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    While recent research results are normally omitted, it is sometimes necessary to include them for WP:DUE weight. In this case, it is usually preferable to read and cite the primary scientific literature in preference to WP:PRIMARYNEWS sources. Later, these primary sources can be replaced or supplemented with citations to high-quality secondary ...

  7. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  8. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Homeopathy. Be aware of predatory publishers, for example journals published by OMICS Publishing Group. These are very unlikely to be accepted as reliable sources.

  9. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (history)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    The primary source is not used to prove the fact, but to illustrate the proof of the fact with the unique voice of that era. This ensures that your use of the primary source is not original research or original research by synthesis: The weighting is derived from a scholarly source; The fact is derived from a scholarly source