When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: textus receptus vs alexandrian manuscripts book of life bible

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Textus Receptus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_Receptus

    The Textus Receptus in Revelation 22:19 reads "book of life" instead of the Nestle-Aland reading "tree of life", which the Textus Receptus contains on the grounds of the Latin Vulgate (380ad) reading, however it is also attested within the scriptural quotations of Ambrose (339 – 4 April 397) and in some Coptic manuscripts.

  3. Textual criticism of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism_of_the...

    For some books of the Bible, Erasmus used just single manuscripts, and for small sections made his own translations into Greek from the Vulgate. [25] However, following Westcott and Hort, most modern New Testament textual critics have concluded that the Byzantine text-type was formalised at a later date than the Alexandrian and Western text ...

  4. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  5. Textual variants in the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    This running list of textual variants is nonexhaustive, and is continually being updated in accordance with the modern critical publications of the Greek New Testament — United Bible Societies' Fifth Revised Edition (UBS5) published in 2014, Novum Testamentum Graece: Nestle-Aland 28th Revised Edition of the Greek New Testament (NA28) published in 2012, and Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio ...

  6. Textual variants in the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    Byz: Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550, Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894, RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005, Greek Orthodox Church [9] καὶ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτούς (and [he] said to them) – Western text-type: D it [8] ὁ δὲ ἀποκριθεὶς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς (but he, answering them, said) – (C vid) E [8] Acts 1:10

  7. Literal Standard Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literal_Standard_Version

    The New Testament is based upon the Textus Receptus and Majority Text, although the translators consulted other manuscripts: "in certain, specific instances other manuscript versions and text-types are used where the evidence seems incontrovertible (e.g., the LXX and DSS in the Hebrew and Aramaic; the Alexandrian in the Greek)." [1]

  8. Textual variants in the Gospel of Luke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    (literally from the under the sky to the under sky) – Alexandrian text-type, Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550, Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894. [ 39 ] ἐκ τῆς ὑπ’ οὐρανὸν εἰς τὴν ὑπ’ οὐρανὸν (literally from the under sky to the under sky ) – RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005.

  9. Novum Instrumentum omne - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novum_Instrumentum_omne

    The manuscripts still exist, but Manetti's version was not printed until 2014. [3] Greek fragments began to be printed as Greek fonts were cut: the Aldine Press published the first six chapters of John's Gospel in 1505. [4]: 59 The early 1500s saw several authorized efforts to create and print scholarly polyglot and Greek editions of Bible texts.