When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case Ruling Right 1962 Robinson v. California: A state cannot make a person's status as an addict a crime; only behaviors can be criminal. 1st 1968 Powell v. Texas: Similarly to Robinson v. California, a state may not criminalize the status of alcoholism itself; the state may only prohibit behaviors. 8th

  4. Larry P. v. Riles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_P._v._Riles

    Larry P. v. Riles is a California court case in which the court held that IQ tests could not be used to place African-American students in special education classes.. Five African-American children had been placed in special classes for the "educable mentally retarded", based on low IQ test scores.

  5. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    Duty to warn is embedded in the historical context of two rulings (1974 and 1976) of the California Supreme Court in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. [15] [page needed] [16] The court held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient ...

  6. Regents of University of California v. Superior Court of Los ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_University_of...

    Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 4 Cal. 5th 607, 413 P.3d 656 (2018), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that universities owe a duty to protect students from foreseeable violence during curricular activities.

  7. Ramona false memory case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramona_false_memory_case

    The Ramona false memory case concerns a California man, Gary Ramona, who successfully sued psychiatrists who supposedly implanted false memories of abuse into his daughter. This was the first instance of a lawsuit against a therapist over implanted memories. [ 1 ]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Christian Legal Society v. Martinez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Legal_Society_v...

    Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 561 U.S. 661 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld, against a First Amendment challenge, the policy of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, governing official recognition of student groups, which required the groups to accept all students regardless of their status or beliefs in order to obtain ...