When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    A sentence is said to be a logical consequence of a set of sentences, for a given language, if and only if, using only logic (i.e., without regard to any personal interpretations of the sentences) the sentence must be true if every sentence in the set is true. [3]

  3. Implicational propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicational...

    Implication alone is not functionally complete as a logical operator because one cannot form all other two-valued truth functions from it.. For example, the two-place truth function that always returns false is not definable from → and arbitrary propositional variables: any formula constructed from → and propositional variables must receive the value true when all of its variables are ...

  4. Material implication (rule of inference) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_implication_(rule...

    In propositional logic, material implication [1] [2] is a valid rule of replacement that allows a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not- P {\displaystyle P} or Q {\displaystyle Q} and that either form can replace the other in ...

  5. Propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

    An axiomatic system is a set of axioms or assumptions from which other statements (theorems) are logically derived. [97] In propositional logic, axiomatic systems define a base set of propositions considered to be self-evidently true, and theorems are proved by applying deduction rules to these axioms. [98] See § Syntactic proof via axioms.

  6. Implication (information science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication_(information...

    An implication A→B is simply a pair of sets A⊆M, B⊆M, where M is the set of attributes under consideration. A is the premise and B is the conclusion of the implication A→B . A set C respects the implication A→B when ¬(C⊆A) or C⊆B.

  7. Necessity and sufficiency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency

    It may be the case that several sufficient conditions, when taken together, constitute a single necessary condition (i.e., individually sufficient and jointly necessary), as illustrated in example 5. Example 1 "John is a king" implies that John is male. So knowing that John is a king is sufficient to knowing that he is a male. Example 2

  8. 2-satisfiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-satisfiability

    The median graph representing all solutions to the example 2-satisfiability instance whose implication graph is shown above. The set of all solutions to a 2-satisfiability instance has the structure of a median graph, in which an edge corresponds to the operation of flipping the values of a set of variables that are all constrained to be equal ...

  9. Implication graph - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication_graph

    In mathematical logic and graph theory, an implication graph is a skew-symmetric, directed graph G = (V, E) composed of vertex set V and directed edge set E. Each vertex in V represents the truth status of a Boolean literal, and each directed edge from vertex u to vertex v represents the material implication "If the literal u is true then the ...

  1. Related searches implication vs ramification v set up examples of questions and solutions

    material implication wikipediamaterial implication formula
    material implication in logicmaterial implication proof