Ads
related to: joint vs and several liability coverage- Free Instant Quote
Get rewarded for your driving
experience. Request a free quote.
- Disappearing Deductible
We'll reduce your deductible over
time with a clean driving record.
- Accident Forgiveness
In an accident? The Hartford
gives good drivers a break.
- Save Hundreds
Save $577* on average on Auto
Insurance from The Hartford.
- Save Avg $577*
4 of 5 drivers who switch to the
AARP Auto Insurance Program save.
- Superior Claims Service
24/7 claims hotline with
caring claims professionals.
- Free Instant Quote
auto.simplfii.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Under joint and several liability or (in the U.S.) all sums, a plaintiff (claimant) is entitled to claim an obligation incurred by any of the promisors from all of them jointly and also from each of them individually. Thus the plaintiff has more than one cause of action: if she pursues one promisor and he fails to pay the sum due, her action is ...
Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...
Under joint and several liability, where two or more people create a single injury or loss, all are equally liable, even if they contributed only a small amount. A state court hearing an admiralty case would be required to apply the doctrine of joint and several liability even if state law does not contemplate the concept.
The defendants were found to have joint and several liability for the damage, with the plaintiffs being awarded damages and interest amounting to about $1.21 million. The defendants’ third party action was dismissed. Costs were awarded in favour of the plaintiffs and the third party against the defendants. Harrington J, in his ruling, found that:
For liability coverage, most insurance professionals advise that you purchase limits higher than state minimum levels to protect yourself against financial strain in the event of an at-fault accident.
In situations where joint and several liability is engaged, contribution claims between parties are governed by the operation of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978, but, in addition there remain several equitable principles developed by the chancery division of the English Courts that are thought to remain in effect. [3]