Ad
related to: case law traffic stop search in ohio today live coveragelegal.thomsonreuters.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
COSHOCTON − The Coshocton County Sheriff's Office conducted a traffic stop that resulted in a drug bust at 11:35 p.m. Wednesday in the 22000 block of Ohio 751 in Lafayette Township.. The ...
Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case which analyzed whether police officers may extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a search with a trained detection dog. [1]
Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.
The judge who authored the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that Sergeant Roberto Felix can’t be sued lamented that a “routine traffic stop has again ended in the death of an ...
A traffic stop, colloquially referred to as being pulled over, is a temporary detention of a driver of a vehicle and its occupants by police to investigate a possible crime or minor violation of law. United States
On April 5, the Northern Ohio Violent Fugitive Task Force offered a $5,000 reward for information leading to Shields' arrest. He was said at that time to be believed have ties to the Cincinnati area.
Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.
Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that extended Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) to allow searches of car compartments during a stop with reasonable suspicion.