Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In social psychology, group polarization refers to the tendency for a group to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of its members. These more extreme decisions are towards greater risk if individuals' initial tendencies are to be risky and towards greater caution if individuals' initial tendencies are to be cautious. [1]
The size of the group also has an effect on how susceptible the group will be to polarization. The greater the number of people in a group, the greater the tendency toward deindividuation. In other words, deindividuation is a group-size-effect. As groups get larger, trends in risk-taking are amplified. [3]
In social psychology and sociology, an in-group is a social group to which a person psychologically identifies as being a member. ... Group polarization
The social identity approach suggests a more general approach to group decision-making than the popular groupthink model, which is a narrow look at situations where group and other decision-making is flawed. Social identity analysis suggests that the changes which occur during collective decision-making are part of rational psychological ...
It was first applied to the topics of social influence, group cohesion, group polarization, and collective action. [8] In subsequent years the theory, often as part of the social identity approach, has been applied to further topics such as leadership, [6] [9] personality, [10] outgroup homogeneity, and power. [11]
Deindividuation is a concept in social psychology that is generally thought of as the loss of self-awareness [1] in groups, although this is a matter of contention (see below). For the social psychologist, the level of analysis is the individual in the context of a social situation.
These snap judgments emerge from the continued polarization between Democrats and Republicans — two parties that, in essence, are distilled coalitions between multiple social, economic and ...
Groupthink is sometimes stated to occur (more broadly) within natural groups within the community, for example to explain the lifelong different mindsets of those with differing political views (such as "conservatism" and "liberalism" in the U.S. political context [7] or the purported benefits of team work vs. work conducted in solitude). [8]