Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
ECT is thought to be morally wrong, just like other medical procedures that bring up controversy, such as abortion. However, “The best spokespeople for ECT are those patients and their family members who know from personal experience how debilitating depression can be and how effectively ECT can provide relief”.
Yang Yongxin (Chinese: 杨永信; born 21 June 1962) is a Chinese psychiatrist who advocated and practiced a highly controversial [3] form of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) without anesthesia or muscle relaxants as a cure for video game and Internet addiction in adolescents.
In 1985, the National Institute of Mental Health and National Institutes of Health convened a consensus development conference on ECT and concluded that, while ECT was the most controversial treatment in psychiatry and had significant side-effects, it had been shown to be effective for a narrow range of severe psychiatric disorders. [28]
The resulting convulsion is modified by the muscle relaxant. ECT is usually given on an inpatient basis; about one in five treatments are given on an outpatient basis. [2] Treatment is usually given twice a week (occasionally three times a week) for a total of 6–12 treatments, although courses may be longer or shorter. [2]
that the ECT machine industry monopolized funding - citation is court testimony; every long term study has confirmed permanent memory loss - 3 citations, one unavailable, the second is here, and the third is a name/date. This statement seems to be original research. that at least one-third of ECT patients experience permanent memory loss - see ...
Criticism (essay on when to use "Criticism" or "Controversy" sections, and related matters) Don't teach the controversy (essay: the phrase doesn't mean what you think it means) List of controversial issues (list of articles prone to edit-warring because they're controversial) POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields (essay on how to avoid ...
Wikipedia:Controversial articles § Describe the controversy – Essay: details on how to do this properly. Wikipedia:Controversy – Essay: controversial articles, by their very nature, require far greater care to achieve a neutral point of view; Wikipedia:Criticism – Essay: covers "Controversy" sections and related matters.
As a compendium of all available knowledge, Wikipedia inevitably covers many topics that are considered especially sensitive, controversial, or even distasteful among the public. If an editor finds themselves editing in such an area, especially when feeling an unpopular viewpoint has not received its due weight , it is important for all parties ...