When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (history)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the descriptive label historian to refer to an historian.

  3. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not...

    Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia, or as a source for copying or translating content. As a user-generated source , it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism , a work in progress , or simply incorrect.

  4. Wikipedia : Potentially unreliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    If using a copyrighted source from a fan site, the citation should be to the source, not the fansite, and the fansite should not be linked to from Wikipedia, not even as a WP:Convenience link. However, be aware of WP:Citing sources#Say where you read it - unless the complete source is available, excerpts may be taken out of context, or changed ...

  5. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    This suggests that the accuracy of Wikipedia is high. However, the results should not be seen as support for Wikipedia as a totally reliable resource as, according to the experts, 13 percent of the articles contain mistakes (10% of the experts reported factual errors of an unspecified degree, 3% of them reported spelling errors)." [89]

  6. Criticism of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 16 January 2025. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...

  7. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    Be aware that these impact factors are not comparable across different academic fields and specialties; the relative rank of a journal among others in its field is the best indicator. PubMed is a search engine that gives access to MEDLINE , an indexing service for peer-reviewed articles in the fields of medicine and biology: it includes all ...

  8. How Taskrabbit helped me tackle my to-do list

    www.aol.com/finance/taskrabbit-helped-tackle...

    Ask me about the most binge-worthy show on Netflix or the best holiday shopping spots, and I’m all in. But when it comes to home repairs or turning a stack of Ikea parts into a fully functional ...

  9. Wikipedia:Verifiability

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    Tiny-minority views need not be included, except in articles devoted to them. If there is a disagreement between sources, use in-text attribution: "John Smith argues X, while Paul Jones maintains Y," followed by an inline citation. Sources themselves do not need to maintain a neutral point of view. Indeed, many reliable sources are not neutral ...