Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
That’s why, in 1996, Monsanto created a GMO that Roundup could be used on without destroying the crop itself — the “Roundup ready” soybean. Other Roundup-ready crops, such as cotton and ...
Food writer Michael Pollan does not oppose eating genetically modified foods, but supports mandatory labeling of GM foods and has criticized the intensive farming enabled by certain GM crops, such as glyphosate-tolerant ("Roundup-ready") corn and soybeans. [52]
Government and scientists were denying the claim that GMO was discriminatory and posed significant human health risk, as well as the call to action to do something about GMOs. Civil society adapted the counter rhetoric of insincerity, claiming that scientists had some kind of “hidden agenda” behind their claim, such as eagerness to just ...
That's a great thing, but it has led to a vocal, passionate debate about the role that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) -- in. Over the past decade, Americans have become more and more ...
Anti-GMO activists have characterized GMO Answers as a public relations ploy by the seed biotech industry to influence an intensifying debate concerning the safety of GMOs and GMO labeling. [1] Huffington Post reported on 130 pages of Ketchum PR internal documents discussing the launch of GMO Answers with a strategy of "embracing skepticism."
In early November, residents in the state of Washington decided they didn't need food companies to label products that had genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in them. These organisms, whose DNA ...
In March Whole Foods Market announced plans to introduce GMO labeling for all products in its Canadian and American stores by 2018. The move made it the first national grocery chain to initiate a ...
Monsanto, headquartered in Creve Coeur, Missouri, is the largest producer of genetically engineered seed.Monsanto has been involved in high-profile lawsuits, as both plaintiff and defendant, and its current and former biotechnology products, its lobbying of government agencies, and its history as a chemical company have made it a controversial corporation. [18]